|
Shanghai's
property price has been pushed so high by foreign buyers,
complains Wang Xin, a clerk of a US-based advertising company
located in Shanghai.
"They
(foreign property buyers) invest in luxury properties, what's
more, they buy and rent common residential housing. Recently I
went to massage, a South Korean slept beside me. The next day, a
Japanese guy was next to me at a barber shop," he adds.
The
past 18 months has witnessed a growth of almost 20 percent in
Shanghai's property prices. But Shanghai's leading position for
foreign property investors in the Chinese market is being
increasingly challenged by Beijing.
Cities
in duel
Before
2003, Shanghai's property price was much lower than Beijing's.
In 2001, according to the statistics bureaux of Beijing and
Shanghai, the average price of commodity properties was 5,062
yuan (US$611.35) per square meter in Beijing, but just 3,721
yuan (US$449.40) per square meter in Shanghai.
Price
growth in Shanghai began to gain momentum in 2003, with property
prices in the metropolis rising by 24.2 percent to 5,118 yuan
(US$618.12) per square meter year-on-year. This is the first
time Shanghai's real estate price surpassed Beijing's. In that
year, Beijing's property price was 4,736 yuan (US$571.98) per
square meter, roughly the same as in 2002.
The
statistics covered both urban and suburban properties. In urban
areas, Beijing's commodity price was 6,396 yuan (US$772.46) per
square meter in 2003 and Shanghai's property price was nearly
7,000 yuan (US$845.41) per square meter.
Philip
Wu, head of Hong Kong-based property consultant DTZ Debenham Tie
Leung's Chongqing office, ranked Shanghai's booming economy, the
gathering of multinational companies in the metropolis,
Shanghai's hosting of World Expo 2010 and foreign and
out-of-town property buyers' rising investment as major factors
pushing up Shanghai's property price.
The
Shanghai municipal government has proposed a series of policies
to encourage property investment, including reducing property
transaction and leasing taxes, simplifying transaction
procedures and supporting the private ownership of former
welfare housing.
"The
beneficial policies, plus the brilliant prospect for Shanghai's
economy and the gathering of regional headquarters of
multinationals in the metropolis, have greatly stimulated
people's purchasing capability," Wu told China Business
Weekly.
A
group of out-of-town investors, particularly those from Wenzhou
in East China's Zhejiang Province, rushed into Shanghai's
property market and more and more foreigners began to buy
housing in Shanghai, says Stanley Chan, president of
Shanghai-headquartered property investment bank Stanley &
Co.
Last
November, Jiao Yang, the spokesman of the Shanghai municipal
government, told reporters that about 5 percent of local
properties in terms of units have been bought by foreigners.
In
Beijing, by the end of August 2003, overseas residents purchased
less than 1 percent of properties in terms of units, according
to DTZ.
In
recent months, overseas residents have purchased more Beijing
properties, but Chan estimated that the figure still does not
exceed 3 percent.
Shanghai's
advantage
While
Beijing developers are struggling hard to attract the attention
of foreign property investors, Shanghai remains ahead of Beijing
in terms of overseas property investment, analysts say.
"To
overseas property investors, Shanghai is China's economic
powerhouse while Beijing mainly is a cultural and political
center. Shanghai is usually the first choice for rational
investors," Chan told China Business Weekly.
Most
multinationals coming to China choose Shanghai as their regional
or national headquarters, making some of its foreign clerks buy
properties in the metropolis.
Both
Wu and Chan say that a major advantage of Shanghai is more
adaptive regulatory and tax policies for those foreign property
buyers.
Wang
Gongwei, chairman of Beijing-based developer Financial Street
Holding Co Ltd, says this is also the primary reason for
Shanghai to attract more multinationals than Beijing.
In
addition, a greater transaction rate of second-hand housing in
Shanghai attracts foreign property investors, Chan says.
In
Shanghai, the ratio between sales of new properties and
second-hand real estate was 1:0.98 in 2003, meaning transactions
of second-hand housing were quite active.
In
Beijing, the ratio was 1:0.2.
"The
higher transaction rate of second-hand housing in Shanghai
indicates better capital liquidity. Investors care a great deal
about whether they can cash in on their properties in the short
term," Chan says.
Banks
are blamed for the lower transaction rate of second-hand housing
in Beijing. When Beijing-based journalist Song Ping wanted to
buy a second-hand house in the Asian Games Village, she was told
by banks that she and the property sellers have to pay a
combined 3 percent fee to obtain a mortgage.
Beijing
sprints
Despite
Beijing's disadvantage, local developers believe the capital is
catching up with Shanghai.
Luo
Gaobo, sales director of Beijing Urban Real Estate Co Ltd, says
the potential for investment return, after two years of rapid
growth, has been reduced in Shanghai, while stable in Beijing.
In
the first three quarters of 2004, Shanghai's property price grew
by 17.7 percent, continuing 2003's strong momentum of 24.2
percent growth.
In
Beijing, the property price in the first 10 months grew by 5.21
percent year-on-year, much lower than the national average of
11.7 percent.
Meanwhile,
a group of Olympic venues and infrastructure projects have been
launched since 2003, greatly improving traffic conditions.
Wu
also notes that Beijing municipal government has introduced
series of beneficial policies since 2003, including halving
property rental tax to 10 percent, simplifying property purchase
procedures and release more property transaction information.
"I
think Beijing could surpass Shanghai as the primary place for
overseas property investors in the near future," Luo says.
Yet,
Hao Wei, vice-president of Shanghai's villa developer Minghong
Real Estate, does not think Shanghai's property market is losing
potential for investment return.
"The
investment return is decided by how strong the demand is,
instead of how high the property price is. We have booming sales
and investors have had good returns," Hao told China
Business Weekly.
Chan
adds that if Beijing wants to replace Shanghai's leading
position in terms of foreign property investment, the government
and local banks have to increase their support to transactions
in second-hand properties.
Beijing
developers should also increase their property management level.
In Shanghai, property management is mainly conducted by
professional firms, while in Beijing, the job is generally taken
on by developers.
"The
situation has to be changed if Beijing wants to get money out of
foreign property investors," Chan says.
|